patch-2.1.30 linux/net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c
Next file: linux/net/ax25/ax25_ds_timer.c
Previous file: linux/net/ax25/ax25_ds_in.c
Back to the patch index
Back to the overall index
- Lines: 226
- Date:
Thu Mar 20 18:17:13 1997
- Orig file:
v2.1.29/linux/net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c
- Orig date:
Wed Dec 31 16:00:00 1969
diff -u --recursive --new-file v2.1.29/linux/net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c linux/net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+/*
+ * AX.25 release 036
+ *
+ * This is ALPHA test software. This code may break your machine, randomly fail to work with new
+ * releases, misbehave and/or generally screw up. It might even work.
+ *
+ * This code REQUIRES 2.1.15 or higher/ NET3.038
+ *
+ * This module:
+ * This module is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
+ * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
+ * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * Most of this code is based on the SDL diagrams published in the 7th
+ * ARRL Computer Networking Conference papers. The diagrams have mistakes
+ * in them, but are mostly correct. Before you modify the code could you
+ * read the SDL diagrams as the code is not obvious and probably very
+ * easy to break;
+ *
+ * History
+ * AX.25 036 Jonathan(G4KLX) Cloned from ax25_out.c and ax25_subr.c.
+ * Joerg(DL1BKE) Changed ax25_ds_enquiry_response(),
+ * fixed ax25_dama_on() and ax25_dama_off().
+ */
+
+#include <linux/config.h>
+#if defined(CONFIG_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE)
+#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/socket.h>
+#include <linux/in.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/timer.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/sockios.h>
+#include <linux/net.h>
+#include <net/ax25.h>
+#include <linux/inet.h>
+#include <linux/netdevice.h>
+#include <linux/skbuff.h>
+#include <net/sock.h>
+#include <asm/uaccess.h>
+#include <asm/system.h>
+#include <linux/fcntl.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+
+void ax25_ds_nr_error_recovery(ax25_cb *ax25)
+{
+ ax25_ds_establish_data_link(ax25);
+}
+
+/*
+ * dl1bke 960114: transmit I frames on DAMA poll
+ */
+void ax25_ds_enquiry_response(ax25_cb *ax25)
+{
+ ax25_cb *ax25o;
+
+ /* Please note that neither DK4EG´s nor DG2FEF´s
+ * DAMA spec mention the following behaviour as seen
+ * with TheFirmware:
+ *
+ * DB0ACH->DL1BKE <RR C P R0> [DAMA]
+ * DL1BKE->DB0ACH <I NR=0 NS=0>
+ * DL1BKE-7->DB0PRA-6 DB0ACH <I C S3 R5>
+ * DL1BKE->DB0ACH <RR R F R0>
+ *
+ * The Flexnet DAMA Master implementation apparently
+ * insists on the "proper" AX.25 behaviour:
+ *
+ * DB0ACH->DL1BKE <RR C P R0> [DAMA]
+ * DL1BKE->DB0ACH <RR R F R0>
+ * DL1BKE->DB0ACH <I NR=0 NS=0>
+ * DL1BKE-7->DB0PRA-6 DB0ACH <I C S3 R5>
+ *
+ * Flexnet refuses to send us *any* I frame if we send
+ * a REJ in case AX25_COND_REJECT is set. It is superfluous in
+ * this mode anyway (a RR or RNR invokes the retransmission).
+ * Is this a Flexnet bug?
+ */
+
+ ax25_std_enquiry_response(ax25);
+
+ if (!(ax25->condition & AX25_COND_PEER_RX_BUSY)) {
+ ax25_requeue_frames(ax25);
+ ax25_kick(ax25);
+ }
+
+ if (ax25->state == AX25_STATE_1 || ax25->state == AX25_STATE_2 || skb_peek(&ax25->ack_queue) != NULL)
+ ax25_ds_t1_timeout(ax25);
+ else
+ ax25->n2count = 0;
+
+ ax25->t3timer = ax25->t3;
+ ax25_ds_set_timer(ax25->ax25_dev);
+
+ for (ax25o = ax25_list; ax25o != NULL; ax25o = ax25o->next) {
+ if (ax25o == ax25)
+ continue;
+
+ if (ax25o->ax25_dev != ax25->ax25_dev)
+ continue;
+
+ if (ax25o->state == AX25_STATE_1 || ax25o->state == AX25_STATE_2) {
+ ax25_ds_t1_timeout(ax25o);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (!(ax25o->condition & AX25_COND_PEER_RX_BUSY) &&
+ (ax25o->state == AX25_STATE_3 ||
+ (ax25o->state == AX25_STATE_4 && ax25o->t1timer == 0))) {
+ ax25_requeue_frames(ax25o);
+ ax25_kick(ax25o);
+ }
+
+ if (ax25o->state == AX25_STATE_1 || ax25o->state == AX25_STATE_2 || skb_peek(&ax25o->ack_queue) != NULL)
+ ax25_ds_t1_timeout(ax25o);
+
+ ax25o->t3timer = ax25o->t3;
+ }
+}
+
+void ax25_ds_establish_data_link(ax25_cb *ax25)
+{
+ ax25->condition = 0x00;
+ ax25->n2count = 0;
+
+ ax25->t3timer = ax25->t3;
+ ax25->t2timer = 0;
+ ax25->t1timer = ax25->t1 = ax25_calculate_t1(ax25);
+}
+
+/*
+ * :::FIXME:::
+ * This is a kludge. Not all drivers recognize kiss commands.
+ * We need a driver level request to switch duplex mode, that does
+ * either SCC changing, PI config or KISS as required. Currently
+ * this request isn't reliable.
+ *
+ */
+static void ax25_kiss_cmd(ax25_dev *ax25_dev, unsigned char cmd, unsigned char param)
+{
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+ unsigned char *p;
+
+ if (ax25_dev->dev == NULL)
+ return;
+
+ if ((skb = alloc_skb(2, GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL)
+ return;
+
+ p = skb_put(skb, 2);
+
+ *p++ = cmd;
+ *p++ = param;
+
+ skb->arp = 1;
+ skb->dev = ax25_dev->dev;
+ skb->priority = SOPRI_NORMAL;
+ skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_AX25);
+
+ dev_queue_xmit(skb);
+}
+
+/*
+ * A nasty problem arises if we count the number of DAMA connections
+ * wrong, especially when connections on the device already existed
+ * and our network node (or the sysop) decides to turn on DAMA Master
+ * mode. We thus flag the 'real' slave connections with
+ * ax25->dama_slave=1 and look on every disconnect if still slave
+ * connections exist.
+ */
+
+static int ax25_check_dama_slave(ax25_dev *ax25_dev)
+{
+ ax25_cb *ax25;
+
+ for (ax25 = ax25_list; ax25 != NULL ; ax25 = ax25->next)
+ if (ax25->ax25_dev == ax25_dev && ax25->dama_slave && ax25->state > AX25_STATE_1)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void ax25_dev_dama_on(ax25_dev *ax25_dev)
+{
+ if (ax25_dev == NULL)
+ return;
+
+ if (ax25_dev->dama.slave == 0)
+ ax25_kiss_cmd(ax25_dev, 5, 1);
+
+ ax25_dev->dama.slave = 1;
+ ax25_ds_set_timer(ax25_dev);
+}
+
+void ax25_dev_dama_off(ax25_dev *ax25_dev)
+{
+ if (ax25_dev == NULL)
+ return;
+
+ if (ax25_dev->dama.slave && !ax25_check_dama_slave(ax25_dev))
+ {
+ ax25_kiss_cmd(ax25_dev, 5, 0);
+ ax25_dev->dama.slave = 0;
+ ax25_ds_del_timer(ax25_dev);
+ }
+}
+
+void ax25_dama_on(ax25_cb *ax25)
+{
+ ax25_dev_dama_on(ax25->ax25_dev);
+ ax25->dama_slave = 1;
+}
+
+void ax25_dama_off(ax25_cb *ax25)
+{
+ ax25_dev_dama_off(ax25->ax25_dev);
+ ax25->dama_slave = 0;
+}
+
+#endif
FUNET's LINUX-ADM group, linux-adm@nic.funet.fi
TCL-scripts by Sam Shen, slshen@lbl.gov