patch-2.1.9 linux/arch/sparc/lib/memset.S
Next file: linux/arch/sparc/lib/mul.S
Previous file: linux/arch/sparc/lib/memscan.S
Back to the patch index
Back to the overall index
- Lines: 167
- Date:
Sat Nov 9 10:12:05 1996
- Orig file:
v2.1.8/linux/arch/sparc/lib/memset.S
- Orig date:
Thu Jan 1 02:00:00 1970
diff -u --recursive --new-file v2.1.8/linux/arch/sparc/lib/memset.S linux/arch/sparc/lib/memset.S
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+/* linux/arch/sparc/lib/memset.S: Sparc optimized memset and bzero code
+ * Hand optimized from GNU libc's memset
+ * Copyright (C) 1991,1996 Free Software Foundation
+ * Copyright (C) 1996 Jakub Jelinek (jj@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz)
+ * Copyright (C) 1996 David S. Miller (davem@caip.rutgers.edu)
+ */
+
+#include <asm/cprefix.h>
+#include <asm/ptrace.h>
+
+#define HANDLE_UNALIGNED 1
+
+ /* Store 64 bytes at (BASE + OFFSET) using value SOURCE. */
+#define ZERO_BIG_BLOCK(base, offset, source) \
+ std source, [base + offset + 0x00]; \
+ std source, [base + offset + 0x08]; \
+ std source, [base + offset + 0x10]; \
+ std source, [base + offset + 0x18]; \
+ std source, [base + offset + 0x20]; \
+ std source, [base + offset + 0x28]; \
+ std source, [base + offset + 0x30]; \
+ std source, [base + offset + 0x38];
+
+#define ZERO_LAST_BLOCKS(base, offset, source) \
+ std source, [base - offset - 0x38]; \
+ std source, [base - offset - 0x30]; \
+ std source, [base - offset - 0x28]; \
+ std source, [base - offset - 0x20]; \
+ std source, [base - offset - 0x18]; \
+ std source, [base - offset - 0x10]; \
+ std source, [base - offset - 0x08]; \
+ std source, [base - offset - 0x00];
+
+ .text
+ .align 4
+
+ .globl C_LABEL(__bzero), C_LABEL(__memset), C_LABEL(memset)
+C_LABEL(__memset):
+C_LABEL(memset):
+ and %o1, 0xff, %g3
+ sll %g3, 8, %g2
+ or %g3, %g2, %g3
+ sll %g3, 16, %g2
+ or %g3, %g2, %g3
+ b 1f
+ mov %o2, %o1
+
+#if HANDLE_UNALIGNED
+/* As this is highly unprobable, we optimize the other case (4 aligned)
+ * Define HANDLE_UNALIGNED to 0, if all the alignment work is done by
+ * the trap. Then we have to hope nobody will memset something unaligned
+ * with large counts, as this would lead to a lot of traps...
+ */
+3:
+ cmp %o2, 3
+ be 2f
+ stb %g3, [%o0]
+
+ cmp %o2, 2
+ be 2f
+ stb %g3, [%o0 + 0x01]
+
+ stb %g3, [%o0 + 0x02]
+2:
+ sub %o2, 4, %o2
+ add %o1, %o2, %o1
+ b 4f
+ sub %o0, %o2, %o0
+#endif /* HANDLE_UNALIGNED */
+
+ .globl C_LABEL(__clear_user)
+C_LABEL(__clear_user):
+ st %o0, [%g6 + THREAD_EX_ADDR]
+ ld [%g6 + THREAD_EX_COUNT], %g1
+ set clear_user_failure, %g2
+ add %g1, 1, %g1
+ st %o7, [%g6 + THREAD_EX_PC]
+ st %g1, [%g6 + THREAD_EX_COUNT]
+ call C_LABEL(__bzero)
+ st %g2, [%g6 + THREAD_EX_EXPC]
+
+clear_user_success:
+ ldd [%g6 + THREAD_EX_COUNT], %g2
+ mov 0, %o0
+ sub %g2, 1, %g1
+ jmpl %g3 + 0x8, %g0
+ st %g1, [%g6 + THREAD_EX_COUNT]
+
+clear_user_failure:
+ jmpl %g3 + 0x8, %g0
+ mov %g2, %o0
+
+C_LABEL(__bzero):
+ mov %g0, %g3
+1:
+ cmp %o1, 7
+ bleu 7f
+ mov %o0, %g1
+
+#if HANDLE_UNALIGNED
+ andcc %o0, 3, %o2
+ bne 3b
+#endif /* HANDLE_UNALIGNED */
+4:
+ andcc %o0, 4, %g0
+
+ be 2f
+ mov %g3, %g2
+
+ st %g3, [%o0]
+ sub %o1, 4, %o1
+ add %o0, 4, %o0
+2:
+ andcc %o1, 0xffffff80, %o3 ! Now everything is 8 aligned and o1 is len to run
+ be 9f
+ andcc %o1, 0x78, %o2
+4:
+ ZERO_BIG_BLOCK(%o0, 0x00, %g2)
+ subcc %o3, 128, %o3
+ ZERO_BIG_BLOCK(%o0, 0x40, %g2)
+ bne 4b
+ add %o0, 128, %o0
+
+ orcc %o2, %g0, %g0
+9:
+ be 6f
+ andcc %o1, 7, %o1
+
+ srl %o2, 1, %o3
+ set bzero_table + 64, %o4
+ sub %o4, %o3, %o4
+ jmp %o4
+ add %o0, %o2, %o0
+
+bzero_table:
+ ZERO_LAST_BLOCKS(%o0, 0x48, %g2)
+ ZERO_LAST_BLOCKS(%o0, 0x08, %g2)
+
+6:
+ be 8f
+ andcc %o1, 4, %g0
+
+ be 1f
+ andcc %o1, 2, %g0
+
+ st %g3, [%o0]
+ add %o0, 4, %o0
+1:
+ be 1f
+ andcc %o1, 1, %g0
+
+ sth %g3, [%o0]
+ add %o0, 2, %o0
+1:
+ bne,a 8f
+ stb %g3, [%o0]
+8:
+ retl
+ mov %g1,%o0
+
+/* Don't care about alignment here. It is highly
+ * unprobable and at most two traps may happen
+ */
+7:
+ b 6b
+ orcc %o1, 0, %g0
FUNET's LINUX-ADM group, linux-adm@nic.funet.fi
TCL-scripts by Sam Shen, slshen@lbl.gov